Partner links

PCLinuxOS 2010 review

pcl2010_00

pclinuxosPCLinuxOS is a APT-ified, Mandriva-based Linux distribution. It’s one of those distributions that offer a separate version for virtually every existing desktop environment. Four of them – Enlightenment, LXDE, Openbox and Xfce are recommended for intermediate to advanced users, while the GNOME and KDE versions are recommended for all user levels (beginner to advanced).

If you make a detailed study of all six versions of this distribution, you are going to question the user-level tagging. But that is the subject of another post. For now, let’s review the KDE version, which was last updated on July 5, 2010.

As with any distribution review, it’s best to start with the installation program.

Installation – The KDE image used for this review is a live CD image. The available boot options are shown in the image below. You get a lot of boot options. While I do not argue with the purpose of a live environment, some people might want to install the distro without first booting into the live environment. It would be a good idea to give those group of users two more options (shown in red in the image).

pcl2010_00

Default boot options plus a couple of suggestions

In contrast, take a look at the boot options of Mandriva One 2010. It is also a live CD, but it offers an option for users who might not want to boot into the live environment, and another option for users who might change their minds about booting or installing from the CD. Most live CD/DVD distributions have these options. It would be a good idea to see them on the next release of PCLinuxOS.

Mandriva boot options

Simple boot options of Mandriva One 2010

Of the major Linux distributions with a live image, PCLinuxOS is, as far as I can recall, the only one that requires a password to install. It’s a requirement that does not make sense to me. It’s not as if the password is hidden or a secret. It’s right there in the middle of the top section of the desktop. I cannot think of a good reason, security or otherwise, why a password is needed to either log into or install a distro from the live environment.

The lack of a Back button at critical steps during the installer process is one very annoying thing, especially if you make a mistake in a previous step. Your only option then is to hit the Cancel button, which means restarting the installation process. All the installers that I have used, even the simplest ones like Ubuntu’s and Mint’s, have a Back button at every step.

Back button

Adding a Back button would also be nice

Here’s another instance where an extra button would not hurt. This time, however, it’s not a Back button, but a Cancel button. Imagine for a moment that you are trying to create a partition as shown in the image below. Midway into the operation, you decide against creating the partition. With the installer, you cannot cancel the operation. You will have to complete it, that is, create the partition, then delete it in the main window. Sure, you could click on the window’s close button in the upper right side, but a Cancel button is more professional and expected.

Cancel button

A Cancel button on the partition creation window would be nice, too.

Yet another annoying aspect of the installer is it’s questionable support for LVM. If you didn’t know any better, you’d think that LVM is officially supported, but you’d be wrong. Trying to configure LVM will eventually get you to the step where the message shown in the image below graces your screen. Clicking Ok to install it will keep you waiting from now ’til thy kingdom come. Some people have reportedly succeeded in configuring LVM on PCLinuxOS, but it’s a crap-shoot. Interestingly, the lvm2 package is in the repository, but why is it not packaged with the installer?

LVM2

Without the LVM2 package, how can you configure LVM?

That’s the end of stuff I do not like about the installer. Actually, there are a few more, but I think these will do for now. What follows is a long list of stuff I also do not like after installation.

Share:

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Partner links

Newsletter: Subscribe for updates

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
84 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Colin
Colin
11 years ago

What a spectacularly useless review. The only thing which I am now wiser about is the inability of the writer to write a competent review. I was however somewhat more interested in learning a bit about the OS. Oh well……

One_Beerhunter
One_Beerhunter
11 years ago

@finid

Thank you for your quick response, I will try to make this short… (nearly impossible for my writing style LOL)

As a general rule I like to think before responding and I like to verify my statements to ensure I’m not just blowing smoke from an orifice. ;’)

First, there was no attempt to brag in my comments, I was referring only to the helpful community of PCLOS users of which Texstar is an active member, there was no ego involved.

Second, I recall a time when typing MCC from cli brought up the Mandrake Control Center from within PCLOS. This was the exact same set of utilities found in the then current Mandrake version. At some point the Mandrake/Mandriva branding was replaced with the word Master, thus allowing the MCC command to still function. The utilities included in that control center were the exact same ones used on the Mandrake version. So like any inquiring mind I asked “What changes have been made?”

Here is the response I received from Texstar regarding the differences between Mandrake/Mandrivas Control Center and PCLOS Master Control Center:

1.rpmdrake was removed because we don’t use urpmi.

2.Help entries depreciated as they pointed to Mandriva help files. The wording of their help package indicated it would not be a good idea to port it to PCLinuxOS. Also control center crash bug report removed as we did not want to send our control center bug reports to mandriva.

3.The Gnome ISO doesn’t include printer packages therefore setup printer doesn’t show in the hardware section until you install printerdrake

4.Lots of little bug fixes here and there.

Other than that it is pretty much the same dang control center underneath.

Finally, a quote from your Ubuntu vs Mandriva review:

Rpmdrake looks and feels nicer than Synaptic, though at the core, they both do the same thing and in the same manner. One nice feature on Synaptic that is absent on Rpmdrake is live search.

So in conclusion, (this is only my opinion based upon your comments) the look and feel of anything is but an example of “beauty is in the eye of the beholder.” Getting pissed off because so and so refuses to implement your suggestions is unhealthy and counter productive to the Linux community as a whole. The beauty of open source is the free sharing of ideas, anyone with the motivation can help themselves to whatever they want to create a distro that pleases themselves and possibly others. Perhaps you should give it a go and see if you can create the perfect distro, you appear to honestly believe you know what that distro would be like and you could included a default firewall, a boot from hard disk,etc. But consider my warning: No matter what you do, regardless of how you set up the OS, what applications you include, how beautiful you think it is, someone will think it sucks.

As I am not familiar with H-Twenty I’ll crack open a Stone brewing “Arrogant Bastard” LOL

One_Beerhunter
One_Beerhunter
11 years ago

@finid

Quote: “The goal of the review was not to be “unbiased,” but to point out faults in the distribution, faults that should never have been there in the first place.”

In my opinion, the purpose of any review is to provide both the positive and negative aspects of whatever is being reviewed. That is what I mean by “unbiased.” Having read several of the other reviews on this site, I cannot help but wonder if the criteria being used changes with the distribution being reviewed. In the review/comparison of Ubuntu vs. Mandriva the lack of a “back” button on the installer is not presented as a showstopper.

Quote: “The Edge: Mandriva by a very wide margin. I wish every distro had their won (own?) MCC.”

Mandriva has their MCC (Mandriva Control Center) PCLinuxOS has their MCC (Master Control Center) and they are basically the same thing. You make no mention of this in the “things you like. ” Mandrake/ Mandriva’s rpmdrake has sent me to dependency hell on numerous occasions. PCLinuxOS which uses apt-get for rpm via Synaptic has never failed me. Actually my best results with rpmdrake were when I used the Texstar repos. Never heard of Texstar? He’s the principle developer of PCLinuxOS. Why is there no mention of MCC in your review of PCLinuxOS, when you repeatedly praise the graphical tools available on Mandriva?

Screen resolution is stated as a minor irritant which makes me think you really didn’t spend much time using PCLinuxOS prior to your review. Mandrake/Mandriva’s XFdrake allows you to set your max screen resolution via “cli” or “mcc.” Had you spent a reasonable amount of time using PCLOS you would find it to be the “Mint” of “Mandriva” a distribution you seem to hold in high regard.

Quote: One of the most important aspects of any distribution is the installer.

This isn’t a fact, it’s an opinion, I’ll take ease of use any day over easy install. From my perspective, also my opinion, PCLinuxOS has a simple install, booting to a live session without bootsplash gives you a good idea of any issues you may encounter, once on the desktop there is even an icon “How to install PCLOS” with detailed instructions, (How nice is that?) something you would not find had you run the installer from the initial boot screen. Synaptic, MCC, the latest and greatest of almost any program you may wish to install, most everything is pre-configured and just works. Any issues you may have are quickly remedied by a helpful community. I’ve actually had emails from Texstar himself in response to a forum question… Kinda like getting a response from Bill Gates when you have problems with Windows.

Regarding install:
As member of a Linux Users Group I am known as the desktop guy, surrounded by developers, admins and assorted rocket scientists (LOL) A recent visitor wanted Linux installed on her laptop and 2 ½ hours later those rocket scientists, several of them, gave up. Their preferred choice of distro still wasn’t working. With less than 15 minutes left before we had to leave, I installed PCLinuxOS on her machine. Sound, video, etc. all working. All this without a “back” button.

Finally, as a proclaimed promoter of free software you do a dis-service to the Linux community when your review so harshly trashes any Linux distribution. To focus entirely on perceived faults while ignoring the very things you praise in other reviews is just wrong. My suggestion, meant only to be helpful, is to establish a published criteria for your reviews and apply it equally to all the distros you review…. Just my two-cents, for whatever they are worth. For anyone reading this, give PCLOS a try, you may find you also disagree with this reviewer’s conclusions.

Scorpio56
Scorpio56
11 years ago

If you replace the file libxulrunner for the latest version then the update-notifier should work.

deadcats
deadcats
11 years ago

Not much of a review. More nitpicking. Writer-failure–go back to journalism school. What, you never attended?

Eddie Wilson
Eddie Wilson
11 years ago

It seems that the worst thing about PCLOS is some of the user base. Look at the comments. A lot of them read like a rabid mindless dog was saying them. If a person doesn’t agree with a review then you give your opinion on the points you disagree with and let it go at that. Some of the PCLOS crowd don’t do that. Quite a few of them resort to personal attacks on the reviewer, other commenter’s, other distros, and even on each other. Maybe the reviewer was a little bias but that is irrelevant. All reviewers are going to have some bias. It’s only human. Some of my comments were not nice either and they weren’t meant to be. Comments like that are not good for anybody. If we can’t stay civil amongst our selfs then how can we ever expect to be a leader in the os world? Think about it. Also, sorry if I offended anybody. It was done with good intentions.

Lee Dillon
Lee Dillon
Reply to  Eddie Wilson
11 years ago

The worst thing about this piece is the lack of proper journalistic skill to do a proper review and to properly research the facts. This is not a review but an opinion of one person who thinks he knows better than everyone else how a distribution should be put together.

PCLinuxOS was created by the community for the users of PCLinuxOS based on our desires and requirements.

I do not see rabid responses. I see people who run PCLinuxOS and understand why it works the way it does. Then I see someone who spent 10 minutes with a LiveCD.

Pieces (I can’t call this a review) like this doesn’t do anybody any good. It is unfair, biased and a hackjob on PCLinuxOS.

David
David
11 years ago

Good grief. Heaven save us all from the rabid fanbois. The review was honest, and pointed out the areas which need looking at. Rather than attacking the author for his honesty, and highlighting it’s flaws, you should pull your bloody heads in and take a good look at yourselves. So far, all you lot have done is defend it religiously without offering any real reasons in defense, and launch personal; attacks against the author. You’ve completely failed to offer any sensible arguments against any of the issues raised, instead being emotional and attacking the author, and their intentions and level of intelligence, etc. Your low level, whiny bitch attitudes are what our community does not need. Grow up. Take it for what it is, constructive criticism, and quit being annoyed that someone has dared point out the flaws in your fave toy.
All the whiny comments just make you look like a bunch of crying kids. Look at what is said, and analyse it, see where it is valid, and ask yourself why some of these decisions have been made. Disabling the firewall, for example, is indeed stupid. It should be enabled by default, and turned off by the user if they desire so, not left off to expose a default install to whatever awaits. All of the comments made by the author are valid points, you lot just can’t let yourselves see that while foaming at the mouth at your keyboards. This childish mentality does none of you any good. Quit while you’re ahead, each attack just reflects more and more poorly on the linux community. FFS.

Adam B
Adam B
Reply to  David
11 years ago

couldn’t agree more myself. well spoken!

Lee Dillon
Lee Dillon
Reply to  David
11 years ago

The software firewall being off is not stupid. There are no open ports exposing anyone to anything. The icon is on the desktop in front of the user if they need it. Most of us PCLinuxOS users are behind hardware firewalls and have no need for an additional software firewall. This is not Windows. Once a user configures their samba shares, nfs and gnutella clients they can then configure the software firewall if needed.

One-Beerhunter
One-Beerhunter
11 years ago

I’m having a hard time believing your review is unbiased…. From the very start it is a demonstration of negativity, finding fault with most everything, implying that there are other faults, etc. I’ll use your 1st two screenshots as an example… Even though the PCLOS bootscreen has numerous usable options not found on the Mandriva bootscreen you choose to mostly ignore them and suggest that it needs to have a “boot from hard disk” option. Why? Anytime I have ever placed a livecd in my cdrom drive it is to boot from that cd. Why would you use a livecd to boot from your hard disk? You suggest that you might change your mind… I’d suggest hitting your reset button and removing the cd. Overall, your review seems hostile; yet fails to mention the arrangement of the default menu, a valid point made by numerous other reviewers. (I personally have always rearranged the menu to my liking regardless of what OS I happen to be running.) I know it must be difficult to write an unbiased review when your comfort zone is elsewhere, but your review is about as “fair and balanced” as a fox news program….

Eddie Wilson
Eddie Wilson
Reply to  One-Beerhunter
11 years ago

“your review is about as “fair and balanced” as a fox news program….”

That’s not fair.

Lee Dillon
Lee Dillon
Reply to  One-Beerhunter
11 years ago

your review is about as “fair and balanced” as a fox news program….

Well said! Bravo!

John
John
11 years ago

I like the new PCLinuxOS 2010. It take some time to install Swedish language pack and OpenOffice. But when its done it works fine for me. For a beginner maybe Pardus 2009.2 are a better choice.
But for a “power” user PCLinux are great.

jink
jink
11 years ago

Dude you got some incorrectness happening in that junk review and your so vain I’m not telling ya. Hope you can get a fix for that chip you have. Go back to Windows we do not need you.

Eddie Wilson
Eddie Wilson
Reply to  jink
11 years ago

“Go back to Windows we do not need you.”
Stupid comment from someone who has nothing to say.

Fop
Fop
11 years ago

This “review” reads like someone with a grudge setting out to settle it (and in some cases not letting the truth get in the way).

You actually have some valid points, but even those are put across in a passive-aggressive manner.

But the killer is that you basically found nothing “right” with PCLinuxOS….. which frankly is plain daft.

Lee Dillon
Lee Dillon
11 years ago

Just because you don’t agree with the Default settings doesn’t make them wrong.

Get the latest

On social media

Security distros

Hacker
Linux distros for hacking and pentesting

Crypto mining OS

Bitcoin
Distros for mining bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies

Crypto hardware

MSI GeForce GTX 1070
Installing Nvidia GTX 1070 GPU drivers on Ubuntu

Disk guide

LVM
Beginner's guide to disks & disk partitions in Linux

Bash guide

Bash shell terminal
How to set the PATH variable in Bash
Categories
Archives
84
0
Hya, what do you think? Please comment.x
()
x