OpenMandriva Lx 2014 app manager

OpenMandriva Lx 2014 is the latest edition of OpenMandriva, a desktop Linux distribution derived from Mandriva Linux. It is one of the distributions that rose out of the ashes of Mandriva Linux; the other being Mageia, and, to some extent, ROSA Desktop.

OpenMandriva Lx 2014 is the distribution’s second, stable release. The previous one was OpenMandriva Lx 2013 (see OpenMandriva Lx 2013.0 review).

The Graphical Installer: If there’s one aspect of this distribution that needs to be totally revamped, it’s the installer. It needs to go. This is the same installer that has been in use in the same form for more than a decade. Within that span, Anaconda, the Fedora system installer, has gone through at least two cod revamps, and was recently completely re-coded.

This screenshot shows the installer’s disk partitioning methods step. Sometimes selecting any of the options when there are existing partitions on the target hard drive puts the system into a reboot loop.
OpenMandriva 2014 Lx partitions

You’ll be informed that “You need to reboot for the partition table modifications to take effect.” And when you do reboot, the whole sequence repeats. In one test installation in a virtual environment, I had to create a new virtual machine before I could install it.
OpenMandriva 2014 Lx partitions

OpenMandriva Lx 2014 is the first edition (of OpenMadriva) to feature support for booting on computers with UEFI firmware. According to the Release Notes, this feature has not been tested extensively and might not work on every UEFI system. I made an attempt (actually, I made several attempts) to set up a dual-boot system between it (OpenMandriva Lx 2014) and Windows 8 on my UEFI-capable system. Sometimes it will boot into the Live Desktop. At other times, it will not. Those times when it did not boot, it got stuck right after the keyboard layout is specified, showing only a blank screen.

Related Post:  OpenIndiana 151a Desktop review

When it did boot into the Live Desktop, every attempt to set up a dual-boot system failed. You may read the details at A frustrating attempt to dual-boot OpenMandriva Lx 2014 and Windows 8 on a PC with UEFI firmware.

At some point, if the installer is not replaced with a completely new one, somebody will have to figure out how to implement full disk encryption on it, because it is still not possible to encrypt a partition mounted at / (root). Without support for encrypting the main partition, any distribution that uses the installer (ROSA Desktop and Mageia included) cannot claim to support full disk encryption.

OpenMandriva disk encryption
A partition mounted at / cannot be encrypted

Aside from the foregoing, a few nice touches have been added to the installer. You’ll be informed, for example, what the minimum system requirements for the installation are.
OpenMandriva Lx 2014 system requirements

And be given the option to enable a few system services. By default, only Samba is enabled.
OpenMandriva Lx 2014 services

The Desktop: The K Desktop Environment (KDE) is the only desktop environment officially supported by OpenMandriva project, and OpenMandriva Lx 2014 shipped with KDE 4.12.4, the latest and greatest software packages for that desktop environment, including Firefox 29, and kernel 3.13.11 nrjQL, which, according to the Release Notes, is “a powerful variant of the 3.13.11 kernel that has been configured with desktop system performance and responsiveness in mind.” That sounds good to me. And it felt that way when I ran it on real hardware.

Related Post:  ROSA Marathon 2012 review

Shown here is the login screen.
OpenMandriva Lx 2014 login screen

And here is the default desktop.
OpenMandriva Lx 2014 KDE desktop

Homerun is the default application launcher (menu) for OpenMandriva Lx 2014. It is one of the best fullscreen application launchers for KDE, much better than SimpleWelcome, the fullscreen app launcher used on ROSA desktop. I use it on my Fedora 20 KDE machine. The only problem I have with it, is that the search algorithm is not very bright.
OpenMandriva Lx 2014 Homerun

A new feature that made this release is FirewallD, a firewall application from the Fedora project that supports dynamic firewall rules and network zones. Aside from a command-line utility and a fully-featured graphical configuration utility, it also comes with an applet. This screenshot shows the entries in the applet’s menu on the OpenMandriva Lx 2014 desktop. FirewallD replaced drakfirewall.
OpenMadriva Lx 2014 Firewalld

Click on any image in this gallery to view other aspects of the OpenMandriva Lx 2014 desktop.

Share:

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Hola! Did you notice that LinuxBSDos.com no longer runs network ads?  Yep, no more ads from the usual suspects that track you across the Internet.  But since  I still need to pay to keep the site running, feel free to make a small donation by PayPal.

Subscribe for updates. Trust me, no spam!

Mailchimp Signup Form

Sponsored links

1. Attend Algorithm Conference, a top AI and ML event for 2020.
2. Reasons to use control panel for your server.
3. DHgate Computers Electronics, Cell Phones & more.

31 Responses

  1. Nice, nice site; indices to rival Cnet on the RHS; no bylines or colophon about permalinks, though? Are you hoping various interest groups will claim credit, landing citations for Santorum For President, Hamas (Patent Division,) KMFDM, and Georgian (EU) Sovereignty 2044?

    I also don’t feel compelled to click on the unlabeled flash bugs (or whatever they are) at the bottom of the page to run them, since there were already ads up top (on this rare, ScriptNo-less occasion.)

  2. Chakra linux needs to be easily installed like Ubuntu or Mageia.
    Something Simple, like the partition of the hard disk with options like: 1) Use existing partitions, 2) Erase and use entire disk 3) Custum disk patitioning.
    Sometimes, People don’t have a lot of time to be wasted trying to figure out how to install Chakra on their PCs. In my case, I prefer to spend my time custumizing my KDE desktop y installing the programs that I need to work, like Rkward or R statistical packages.
    Regards,
    Michael

  3. It’s now possible, during the installation process, to select the partition in which install the boot loader, instead of the MBR?

    1. Thanks Luca,
      But, I was saying about the Partition Disc Tool,not about the Boot Loader. I would like to see in Chakra something simple like the Partition disk tool as in Mageia or Ubuntu. So, you don’t need to resize your hard disk because you choose 1) installs along side Windows for dual booting, 2) uses the entire disk or 3)Custums disk patitioning for advanced users and Mageia or Ubuntu make it for you, except the Custum partition which is targeted for advanced users.
      Regards,
      Michael

  4. Oh… you forgot to mention how Chakra has Removed all GTK applications from the repos… but I guess that isn’t significant enough to mention in a review?

    1. Not correct – the gtk and gtkmm libraries are in the official repository and even installed by default. What are NOT in the (official) repos are gnome dependant apps such as firefox and chrome. Strangely, bonobo is also in the repo so with just a couple of more “gnome” libs, they could have a minimal gnome platform enabled.

      I usually delete all gnome libs that I can but leave just enough to allow chrome/firefox to be installed. I am looking to rid of firefox as all KDE/QT browsers based on webkit are already outperforming firefox on all counts except flash support- firefox always works better with flash but with 11.2 beta, I think that gap has narrowed.

      The only GTK app I will hae now is chrome and since chrome is being re-written to not depend on GTK, we will wait and see.

      I have no problem with GTK but over the years, gnome co-opted GTK and made it more intertwined with a lot of gnome libs.

      1. Not correct? I never said anything about gtk and gtkmm libs… I said “GTK APPS” or on other words like you stated… “apps dependent on gtk”

        As for the rest of the ramblings you mention… i’m glad you have your own likes/dislikes and opinions of what works best for you…. But maybe you should include the Gtk application issue in your review since it is the most significant restraint on users who may want a complete out of the box user friendly distribution but may not be aware of this limitation until they waste time installing chakra not knowing what they are getting… Not everbody reads over the wiki before installing a distro… alot rely on word of mouth and reviews like this… Alot of people would appreciate a complete unbiased review of the good and the bad… the gtk issue should be one of the first things to mention so that people know what it’s all about

        kaddy

  5. If you do not like the KISS model please use other distro,the thing grat about KISS is that the user is inh control, if i want to run a daemon I must start it or add it in rc.conf, in this way I do not have a lot of useless daemons starting at boot(maye I do not use a printer,or NFS or bluethouth).

    Conclusion is that Arch/Chackra is not for you and they do not target newbies or people that do not have the time to set it up. You must search other distribution that will work better for you.

    1. wrong…. the chakra website cleary states it’s intention to be “user friendly” where as archlinux does not have this aim… get your facts straight

  6. After the withdrawal of support from Canonical for Kubutnu, Chakra looks to be an excellent alternative. However few things need work, notably the daemons, apart from printing, SAMBA setup needs to be simplified right on the lines of Kubuntu where its just right click on any folder and enable, nothing more to do. The dev team at the forum is extremely receptive and helpful so I am sure in few more releases, this would be the best KDE distro out there.

    1. True, the devs are very receptive and take criticism in stride. If only we can get them to change some of their philosophical stance on the default installation.

      People have to realize that not everyone wants to get their hands dirty, or even have the skill to do so. Many non-techy users just want something that works. Even some techy users would not mind if everything just works.

      1. At Chakra we feel we do the users a greater disservice by not letting them understand what a system is about. No, not requiring them to build and do everything from scratch, but decide what to run and why, learning how to activate and set certain things to their liking.
        Of course you are correct that there are many users who have zero interest in this, and for those there are many other options, as you pointed out. That does not mean, there is no great demand for an OS who does things differently. Not talking Chakra here, it is still a very small distro. But look at the most used distro’s, Debian & Arch absolutely do not set up for point and click use, and those are among the most used distro’s…..

        1. If your goal is to appeal to a specific group of users, that’s your call.

          But why spend so much time working on something, and place an artificial barrier to its adoption.

          There was a time when Apple appealed to a niche audience, and for that, the company struggled mightily.

          But looked what happened when they started building stuff that Joe and Jane User can relate to.

          You know, there are Chakra users who could have been using Arch, but chose Chakra instead. The difference? A graphical installer. That’s what something as simple as a user-friendly application can do. There was a time when I was a Gentoo user. Imagine spending a whole weekend compiling KDE. It was fun, but then it got stale.

          Now, I want to spend my time doing actual work, not spending an inordinate amount of time tweaking the OS.

          For the record, I just installed Archimedes on the only computer at my Church. It was running Linux Mint. Why did I opt for Chakra in spite of the advantages that Mint has over it? Rolling-release model. The pros of RR, for this particular use situation, far outweighs all the other stuff.

          1. There are other thinkable quality characteristics of an OS aside from “out of the box” and “GUI type ease of use”.

            Why is anything not falling into these two Jane-Joe-Apple categories always pictured as tinkering for the sake of it, an unnecessary PITA?

            What about *ease of learning* the workings of my OS, making things clear?
            This, of course, includes getting the more arcane stuff with a bad “learn-effect-effort-ratio” out of my way.
            It’s a case to case decision and I use Chakra because of its good compromise: Making me learn important skills without stealing my time.

          2. “… and I use Chakra because of its good compromise: Making me learn important skills without stealing my time.”

            That is fine. But what about those who do not want to learn about an OS just to use a PC to read email, surf the Internet, and chat? What about those who do not have the time to learn how the OS works, who just want everything to work?

          3. What is with them? Are they incapable of anything that does not include a button and a red/green-light switch to indicate the concept of activating something?
            Are they too dumb to add a simple name to a list or opening a text file instead of a GUI?
            Is the concept of installing a program beyond them, so that I have to remove tons of pre-installed stuff instead?

            Why are those poor souls always told that “mkdir foo bar” is somehow rocket-science compared to a dozen mouse-clicks?

            Of course there are things which easier in Chakra. I just don’t think the solution is a broad concept of “fitting-all-out-of-the-box” but, as said, an array of wise case-by-case decisions.

      2. I want Chakra to be replacement for Kubuntu, with its semi rolling release model, it promises to be even better than the LTS version. All they need to do is add the user friendly components like printer and samba right out of the box and they are set to be the best. Also we need torrents for download, not just direct sourceforge download. The CCR system is superb and so is the package manager, however during dist upgrade, package manager usually fails and Konsole has to be evoked, this would again scare many who are used to GUI, something on lines of update manager needs to be implemented as well.

      3. For an OS to get acceptance with general public, it needs to be easy with option to get your hands dirty for the purists, this is what Kubuntu did, now Chakra can do the same.

    2. I’m not quite sure why you think that Kubuntu will be losing support from Canonical. Chakra may be another KDE option but you will not get any more support from them then from Canonical. The ONLY thing that will change in the Kubuntu camp is that the ONE PAID developer will be working on what he was doing in his spare time. Kubuntu will still be using Canonical’s infrastructure which makes it the same as the other variants in the Ubuntu world. It’s doubtful that this change in the financial support of the one paid developer will ever be noticed. These are the facts in matter and where people are getting the ideal that Kubuntu is being abandoned by Canonical is beyond me.
      By the way, nice review.

  7. One more correction. You state that it is written AppArmor is packaged, but then you underline the one and only sentence were AppArmor is mentioned in this distribution, as you can read the kernel is build with this as one of the MAC hardening options. Since the AppArmor frontend needs GTK2, Chakra has chosen to include tomoyo-tools to handle this.

    That things are not activated by default is not a question of a dev not willing to take 2 minutes to activate it (what would another 2 minutes be in the 40-50 hours it takes to get an ISO ready?), but is a choice. Printing for example is not used daily by the majority of the users, why have a service running at all times, that might not be used at all, or for most, not more then once or twice a week?

      1. No, I’m saying that Chakra has chosen to use tomoyo-tools to handle the MAC hardening options. And stating that it is not mentioned anywhere, that AppArmor is inluded in the repo’s.

        1. Our kernel has followed settings enabled:

          #
          # Security options
          #
          CONFIG_KEYS=y
          CONFIG_TRUSTED_KEYS=m
          CONFIG_ENCRYPTED_KEYS=m
          # CONFIG_KEYS_DEBUG_PROC_KEYS is not set
          # CONFIG_SECURITY_DMESG_RESTRICT is not set
          CONFIG_SECURITY=y
          CONFIG_SECURITYFS=y
          CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK=y
          # CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM is not set
          CONFIG_SECURITY_PATH=y
          # CONFIG_INTEL_TXT is not set
          # CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX is not set
          # CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK is not set
          CONFIG_SECURITY_TOMOYO=y
          CONFIG_SECURITY_TOMOYO_MAX_ACCEPT_ENTRY=2048
          CONFIG_SECURITY_TOMOYO_MAX_AUDIT_LOG=1024
          # CONFIG_SECURITY_TOMOYO_OMIT_USERSPACE_LOADER is not set
          CONFIG_SECURITY_TOMOYO_POLICY_LOADER=”/sbin/tomoyo-init”
          CONFIG_SECURITY_TOMOYO_ACTIVATION_TRIGGER=”/sbin/init”
          CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR=y
          CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR_BOOTPARAM_VALUE=0
          # CONFIG_IMA is not set
          # CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO is not set
          # CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR is not set
          CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC=y
          CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY=””
          CONFIG_XOR_BLOCKS=m
          CONFIG_ASYNC_CORE=m
          CONFIG_ASYNC_MEMCPY=m
          CONFIG_ASYNC_XOR=m
          CONFIG_ASYNC_PQ=m
          CONFIG_ASYNC_RAID6_RECOV=m
          CONFIG_ASYNC_TX_DISABLE_PQ_VAL_DMA=y
          CONFIG_ASYNC_TX_DISABLE_XOR_VAL_DMA=y
          CONFIG_CRYPTO=y

          If somebody needs apparmor there is always CCR to add it too.

  8. Thx for this great review. Some corrections you might have missed:

    Take-Off: “Its only major shortcoming is that it has no search feature” – this is total wrong. Open Take-Off-Launcher and just type anything. If you type “K3B” only K3B will be displayed if installed. If you type “Browser” all icons with “Browser” in the name will be displayed. Take-Off has a very good search-engine.

    rcconf-settings: On release-day rcconf-settings was not compatible to our rc.conf file. That’s why it was disabled in our pkg-list for this release. Will be installed by default on the next revision of Archimedes in 3 weeks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get the latest

On social media
Via my newsletter
Mailchimp Signup Form

Partner links

1. Attend Algorithm Conference, a top AI and ML event for 2021.
2. Reasons to use control panel for your server.
3. DHgate Computers Electronics, Cell Phones & more.
Hacking, pentesting distributions

Linux Distributions for Hacking

Experts use these Linux distributions for hacking, digital forensics, and pentesting.

Categories
Archives

The authors of these books are confirmed to speak during

Algorithm Conference

T-minus AI

Author was the first chairperson of AI for the U.S. Air Force.

The case for killer robots

Author is the Director of the Center for Natural and Artificial Intelligence.

Why greatness cannot be planned

Author works on AI safety as a Senior Research Scientist at Uber AI Labs.

Anastasia Marchenkova

An invitation from Anastasia Marchenkova

Hya, after stints as a quantum researcher at Georgia Tech Quantum Optics & Quantum Telecom Lab, and the University of Maryland Joint Quantum Institute, I’m now working on superconducting qubit quantum processors at Bleximo. I’ll be speaking during Algorithm Conference in Austin, Texas, July 16 – 18, 2020. Meet me there and let’s chat about progress and hype in quantum computing.