Partner links


Stuff that could make you say WTF!

  1. Network Time Protocol (NTP) is one of those services I like to use. The system uses it to sync with NTP servers on the Internet. Basically, it enables the computer to keep accurate time, and If my computer is connected to the Internet, I like it to keep accurate time, all the time. The Ubuntu installer uses NTP to set the time during installation. After installation, however, NTP is not even installed. I think that every computer should have NTP installed and running. If you are with me on this and you need to install and enable it, you can view the instructions here.
  2. If you are trying to install Ubuntu 10.04 desktop on a hard drive that has an existing Linux distribution, that is, if you are trying to setup a dual-boot system, and if the existing distro was installed using an LVM (Linux Logical Volume Manager) disk partitioning scheme, the Ubuntu installer cannot “see” it. In the image below, for example, the Ubuntu installer reports that “This computer has no operating system on it.” However, if you look closely, you will notice that two partitions already exist on the computer. The first one, /dev/sda1, is the boot partition, and the second, /dev/sda2, is the unencrypted physical volume of a Sabayon 5.2 installation.

    Although the Ubuntu installer could not detect any, there are existing Linux partitions on the computer that I am attempting to install Ubuntu 10.04 on

    This is what happened when I tried to manually partition the disk. The installer clearly shows that /dev/sda1 has an existing ext4 filesystem, which is actually the boot partition of the Sabayon 5.2 installation. As reported earlier, /dev/sda2, which the installer could not determine the Type, is an unencrypted physical volume of an LVM-based Sabayon 5.2 installation. If faced with a similar situation, your best solution would be to first install Ubuntu, then the other distribution.

    partitions exist

    image shows that there are existing Linux partitions that the Ubuntu installer could not detect

  3. If you are as paranoid as I am, you probably like to encrypt your hard drives. Not just encrypting one or two partitions, but the whole drive. Unfortunately, the Ubuntu desktop installer lacks support for full disk encryption. The best it does with regards to encryption is provide an option to encrypt your home folder. In terms of enhancing the physical security profile of your Ubuntu installation, this option actually does very little. As far as I’m concerned, it’s useless. It is a sloppy implementation of (disk) encryption. For an excellent example of how disk encryption should be implemented, read how Fedora protects your computer with full disk encryption.
    Home folder encryption
  4. Assuming that you opted to encrypt your home folder, the system will present this informational window to you when you first boot into your newly installed Lucid Lynx desktop. So you say, why not, I’ll “Run this action now.”
    passphrase generator

    This is what happens when you click on the “Run this action now” button. You will need to print or write down that 32-character passphrase, and store it in a safe location (hopefully, you’ll remember where when you need to use it). Like I wrote earlier, this is sloppy.

  5. Why is ufw not running and why is a graphical firewall client not installed? ufw is Ubuntu’s user-friendly command line interface to the firewall application built into the Linux kernel. Out of the box, the ufw service is not started. And Gufw, the graphical interface to ufw, is not even installed. It’s either that the folks at Ubuntu think that you don’t need to run a firewall on their distro, or they just want you to give you something extra to do.

    Here’s where I stand on this: You need to have an active firewall on your system. And that applies whether there are open ports or not. And to make it easier to manage the firewall, you need to have a graphical firewall client installed. You can find instructions on how to install and enable a graphical firewall client on Ubuntu here.

  6. Dude, what happened to the title bar? The title bar is that section of a window which sits atop the menu bar. You can see it in the image below. In the course of writing this review, it just disappeared.
    Title bar

    Nautilus file manager with the title bar intact

    Here’s the same window without the title bar. Where did it go. I sure did not do anything to cause it to pull a houdini on me. In any case, rebooting brought it back from where ever it went. Has anybody else experienced this?

    no title bar

    What happened to the title bar?

  7. And why does the screen resolution keep changing? My test monitor is an LG FLATRON M237WD. The highest resolution available is 1920×1080 and the lowest 640×480. The available refresh rates are 75Hz and 60Hz. But that’s when everything is working as intended.

    Display (monitor) settings

    Sometimes the screen resolution changes automatically such that the available screen resolutions are the ones shown in the image below, with a lone refresh rate of 60Hz. What that does is shift the viewport to the left, leaving a black, one inch margin to the right side of the display. Logging out and then back in does not fix it, only a restart does.


    Display or monitor settings manager



Partner links

Newsletter: Subscribe for updates

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
13 years ago

Previous Ubuntu distros impressed me, felt at home. Downloaded 10.04 can’t wait “to play in the park”. I am an AMD and Ubuntu staunch believer. Baie dankie Ubuntu.

13 years ago

I was stuck with ubuntu 7.04 for quite some time for the fear of compatibility issues in the future versions. But i’ll have to say this version of ubuntu has every fix for my probs in it. I have an acer aspire 4720z and the Atheros wireless cards were my issue from the first. Let’s just say that I didn’t had to look beyond the network manager to connect to my hidden WPA2 wireless network with static ip. The network manager is gud enough for me and thats all I need in this version.
BTW I have also planned on checking the new Fedora release as it has been ages since I had one. Linux sure has got most things sorted out. Its just the office 07 compatibility that I would love to have in The Media player handles most of the formats after the installation of the basic plugins and the VLC media player is always there to offer more support. IPod – RhythmBox integration is gud. Certain bugs in my Itunes(like the updated song author name and stuff) is getting fixed in Rhythmbox. Blueman for bluetooth is also good. GIMP is excellent for the features it can provide on a open source platform and that too compared to the more expensive photoshop for windows.
Finally Skype, I really didn’t like using it till I came to linux. But now I just can’t seem to stop using it. It gives me better quality even when compared to Google voice chat using Pidgin or Empathy client.
Ubuntu Tweak helps me getting the other softwares. Docky for switching windows is also good. IpMsg2, screenlets, compiz add more taste to the OS. Opera, chrome, audacity, openshot video editor nearly complete the package. Since I didn’t like Wine that much. I still love to wait for the linux softwares to kick the ass of all windows softwares. The time for linux to take the stage is near. But it won;t be possible without gaining trust of the entreprise market which would only be possible through a dedicated support services offered by someone in the linux community. Once thats up, the software market can start enjoying some price cuts :p I believe.

Anyways, I wouldn’t be switching back to windows anytime sooner.

13 years ago

I decided to trade a computer for chores. Would give them the latest greatest Ubuntu.
Was I surprised. First disappointment was when I found that I could bot go above 800 by 600. Why? because it would bot detect my monitor correctly. On top of that, xconfig-conf was done away with. After 90 minutes of searching on the web, I gave up on it. I changed to a slightly newer monitor (still older than 5 years) and got a whopping 863 x 600. This display was known for min 1200 x 1024.
The person I am setting this up for, loves games. No problem. I go to their new package manager. Great idea, but not complete. One of the powerful features of Synaptecs manager is that you can choose many items, then install. With this new one, you do not have that option. You can choose other apps to install while the first is installing, but it was just irritating. I finally get the games installed,oops, most are not in the menu. I actually have to manually add them in. To be fair, Synaptecs did not add them either. Apparently their new menu is not backwards compatible. Major no no in my book.
Finally, today, a distro on the level of Ubuntu, should automatically mount usb drives without making the user guess.
I like ubuntu, mainly because it is very stable. But I am now searching for a different distro. PcLOS has a great system, I have found it less stable though. It does recognize most of the wifi cards without having to run ndis driver though. I think I might revisit that.

13 years ago

Ubuntu 10.04 works just fine for me. I have tryed the latest Mandriva One to. But if you like the KDE desktop the 2 best in my opinion are the new Pardus 2009.2 and PCLinuxOS 2010.1
Works “out of the box”
If you want the same in Mandriva you must pay for Powerpack version.

13 years ago

Distros ranking or acceptance among Linux users means everything, that means the disto offered is stable, functional and easy to run and implement and well maintained. Its obvious you are a Mandriva fan and no amount of work by Ubuntu will convince you of otherwise. In your comparison, you write Ubuntu doesn’t have graphical firewall tool like Mandriva, whats GUFW btw? As for synaptic versus mandriva’s paclage manager, no comparison, synaptic is far more clearer and debian package management rules not to mention the plethora of offering via medibuntu and ppa.

13 years ago

If Mandriva was even half as polished as Ubuntu it wouldn’t be going bankrupt today and would come at least closer in distro watch ranking to Ubuntu. Having used both, Ubuntu wins by many aspects.

13 years ago

I installed Ubuntu 10.04 over version 9.04 on my Dell Latitude 2100 netbook and it is the best to date. Everything worked out of the box, no tweaking necessary. The main thing I want is the Software Centre to be fully functional and replace all other software install apps (although Synaptic will be a challenge to). I really like where Ubuntu is going. There are a few things which I don’t like, but nothing to whinge about, it is still evolving and maturing, trying to find its place.

I love the window buttons on the left. Yes, it is about time. I had actually changed mine to the left last year before I ever knew about 10.04 was going to do it. Complaint: ‘I been using Windows all my life and used to it being on the right.’ Not a reason only an excuse. It takes a short time to get used it. The reason I changed it is that is makes mouse movement more efficient. Also, if you want to be more efficient, if you are right handed try using the mouse with your left hand, because the right is free to jot down any notes while you are moving the mouse with your left. This taes a little while longer to get use to, but the rewards are there. Give it a go. Change to something better.

Get the latest

On social media

Security distros

Linux distros for hacking and pentesting

Crypto mining OS

Distros for mining bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies

Crypto hardware

MSI GeForce GTX 1070
Installing Nvidia GTX 1070 GPU drivers on Ubuntu

Disk guide

Beginner's guide to disks & disk partitions in Linux

Bash guide

Bash shell terminal
How to set the PATH variable in Bash
Hya, what do you think? Please comment.x