Elementary OS

Elementary OS Luna preview

The first beta edition of what will become Elementary OS Luna has been released. Luna is a bold attempt to revamp and completely retool Jupiter, the distribution’s first edition. I got a first look at what Luna will bring to the table with the latest stable edition of Pear Linux, whose shell, Pear Shell, is based on Pantheon, the desktop environment and shell of Elementary OS.

From what I have so far observed about Elementary OS Luna, it is built atop Ubuntu Precise Pangolin, on Linux kernel 3.2. It uses a pre-Ubuntu 12.10 version of Ubiquity, Ubuntu’s graphical installation program, which means that it lacks support for LVM and full disk encryption.

While there is nothing new from the developers of this distribution at the installation stage, there is some fresh thinking and applications at the user interface level. This is a beta release, so I’m not going to pass any judgement here. What follows are a few screen shots from a test installation of this release.

Pantheon Greeter, the login screen, is built atop LightDM.
Luna Login

The default desktop. The (top) panel is called WingPanel. The dock is based on Plank.
Luna Desktop

The applications menu is Slingshot.
Luna Slingshot

The second page of Slingshot.
Luna Slingshot

The desktop showing the online activity indicator on WingPanel.
Luna Desktop

On the applications side, Geary is the email client. This is the settings window.
Luna Geary

Maya is the built-in calendar application. Setting up events is easy.
Luna Maya

Maya is exportable to a file. More than any other, Maya is an application that I really need. I have an online calendar that I use, but it’d be nice to have one on my desktop.
Luna Maya Calendar

Noise is the name of the music player. Never really played anything with it, but sooner than later, I will.
Luna Noise Music

The text editor is Scratch.
Luna Scratch

Scratch has a built-in terminal, just like Dolphin, KDE’s file manager.
Luna Scratch Terminal

The graphical package should be very familiar, right?
Luna Software Center

What I especially like about the whole desktop is that every aspect is clean, uncluttered and very intuitive to use. This is definitely one distribution to keep an eye on. I think the final, stable edition should be released sometime next year, early next year. Download links for 32-bit and 64-bit version of Elementary OS Luna beta are available at the bottom of this page.

Subscribe to LinuxBSDos.com

Subscribe to receive the latest articles in your Inbox

I agree to have my personal information transfered to MailChimp ( more information )

Trust me, you'll not be spammed...

Please share:

We Recommend These Blockchain Conferences and Servicess

Register now for Blockchain & Decentralized Tech SuperSummit, international conference on blockchain technnology in Dallas, TX (USA), October 30 - November 2, 2018

Learn how to trade cryptocurrencies profitably using technical and fundamental analysis at BDT SuperSummit

Best binary auto trading software reviews by 7binaryoptions.com

Launch an SSD VPS in Europe, USA, Asia & Australia on Vultr's KVM-based Cloud platform starting at $5:00/month (15 GB SSD, 768 MB of RAM).


  1. Scott M. Allen ( Scooter )

    From now on – I”m steering clear of community based linux. They’re always so ruff and buggy. Call Me Whiny – but I can’t warm up to Unity. Elementary looks so dummed down and like a colorforms operating system. What are we 13 years old. I like clean and efficient. I don’t want menu bars that are 45 items long – I like the docky thing as a launcher. Just type a few letters and up comes a list of what you want. I’m still missing Gnome 2.

  2. Pingback: Links xx/11/2012: Fedora 19 is Schrödinger’s Cat, Android Grabs 90% Smartphones Share in China | Techrights

  3. I should have added that I *really* like Elementary’s application menu; it’s clean, neat, well laid-out, and really improves the classic menu concept rather than attempting to eliminate it.

  4. The top bar is a serious waste of space, and has very little function embedded in it. Some other desktop UIs use the top bar for task switching, but Elementary doesn’t do this. So, it needs to find another way to switch tasks and desktops; for this it has adopted OSX’s “hot corners” approach. So, the user has three separate controls to master (dock at the bottom, bar at the top, hot corners). Why the fragmentation?

    Wouldn’t it be simpler to remove the top bar altogether, and transfer its minimal functionality into the bottom dock? Keep the hot corners if you like, although switching desktops that way is fine once or twice, but becomes annoying if you need to switch 100 times a day – it means zooming the mouse to a corner, then moving it to the desktop icon in the middle of the screen, then watching the animation as the desktop changes. It’s all quite busy, and not really very minimalist.

    Do we really need large thumbnails of each open window? Aren’t small program icons enough? A much more concise (elementary?) arrangement has 1) an autohiding dock at the bottom, incorporating the “applications” menu and other little notifiers that Elementary currently has at the top, and 2) an autohiding panel (tint2 works really well for this) at the top, with separate panels representing each desktop, and showing program icons to represent apps running in each desktop.

    Any good desktop UI can be reorganized like this, without the need to use 500MB of memory while idling, as Elementary does. My Xfce installation works this way, uses much less memory, and still keeps the customization options that Elementary has taken away (but that’s another conversation).

  5. They should of used Deepin Software Center

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *