Linux Mint Debian review


This is what this installation steps looks like when all the partitions have been created with GParted. The installer will proceed with the installation even when a swap partition does not exist.



GRUB, the GRand Unified Bootloader, is the only boot loader supported by the installer. This is GRUB 2 and not GRUB legacy. At this stage, the installer shows no support for extra boot loader settings, like password-protection and (boot loader) timeout.


GRUB settings

Software Manager: Out of the box, the package manager is pointed at Debian’s testing repository with non-free components.



An observation I made about Mint’s Software Manager in the review of Linux Mint 9 is the need for a separate category for security application. I think it would make it easier to browse through the list of security and security-related applications available on the system. I hope Clem and the Mint team will take this suggestion in to consideration at some point before they roll out the stable version.


Software categories

Final Thoughts: I am sure that Mint fans are rejoicing over the rolling updates feature of Linux Mint Debian. While I acknowledge that rolling updates is a very cool feature, I would like to see Clem and crew live up to their promise to make this edition “as similar as possible as the main edition.” For me, an important part of that promise is to see an installer that is, feature for feature, a match for the Debian installer.


The promise

The new installer on this experimental release bears no resemblance to that on its parent distribution. The Debian installer is a full-featured one. It has support for most features that are standard on the best Linux installation programs – full disk encryption, LVM, and RAID. If Linux Mint Debian aims to be “as similar as possible” to its parent distribution, that similarity should extend to the installation program.

In many respects, a distribution’s installation program is what sets it apart from others. All things being equal, it is the reason I would rather use Sabayon than, say, Mint, or Fedora rather than Ubuntu desktop (not Ubuntu with text installer).


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest
Share on linkedin

Newsletter: Subscribe for updates

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
11 years ago

I agree with Disposed. If you think there is no difference between a distro that’s based off the rock solid Debian and the more buggy Ubuntu then you’re less informed than I thought. Add to the fact that with LMDE you can keep your system maintained without downloading more ISOs. Now I will go to Mint 9 and see their review of Iceweasel 😛

11 years ago

This review makes no sense. The installer is the least important part of a distribution. You install it once then forget it.

LMDE is not identical to the ubuntu versions you should have done a full review and found out the real differences instead of wasting 2 pages on the freaking installer.

There will be performance differences, different packages available etc. a competent reviewer would have gone over these things instead of pissing around with the stupid installer.

Reply to  finid
11 years ago

Are you freaking joking? The installer is not important at all. its a freaking ROLLING RELEASE you install it once, EVER.

If you are reviewing the installer of a RR distro you are an idiot…

Reply to  finid
11 years ago

Also what is your point with linking 2 more of your clearly ignorant articles?

Do you think citing your own opinions as a source will sway anybody but yourself?

I get it you think the installer is important, and it is with a 6 months distro like Ubuntu or an 8 month distro like OpenSUSE but to say its important for a rolling release distro just shows that you dont really get what rolling release is.

Reply to  finid
11 years ago

I am no longer interested in arguing with you. You are wrong and make halfass asinine arguments to back up your ignorant statements.

Comparing the installer to the foundation is just stupid, it is not the foundation it installs the foundation. Its like showcasing a building by talking about the fat guy that drove the cement truck while it was being built.

I have removed my subscription and have no desire to ever return to this horrid blog of yours. Good luck in the future and hopefully some day you will learn how to actually review a distro.

Reply to  Disposed
11 years ago

Of course you’re not interested in arguing with him, you’re wrong and he’s quite right. The installer IS important, to suggest otherwise just highlights your own ignorance and lack of understanding. Also, constantly insulting the reviewer because you don’t like what they say about something shows you to have the maturity of a 5 year old. Grow up.

11 years ago

I was hoping get more thoughts from the reviewer about the system after it was installed and running. 99.99% of the time I spend with a distribution is post-install. At that point, I’m not really that concerned with how the install process went. I’m more concerned with how easy the system is to administer- what tools are provided by the distro facilitate system administration, etc..

iphone 4
iphone 4
11 years ago

Good for Debian. It is a great news. More power on the testing and looking forward for it. I have great views pertaining to it. Thanks for the great post. More power.

11 years ago

I think what they meant by “as similar as possible to the main edition” is to be similar to the main edition of Mint, i.e. the Gnome Ubuntu based version.

11 years ago

Very, very curious

Is apparmor (for firefox or other browser) included in the default install?

Get the latest

On social media

Security distros

Linux distros for hacking and pentesting

Crypto mining OS

Distros for mining bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies

Crypto hardware

MSI GeForce GTX 1070
Installing Nvidia GTX 1070 GPU drivers on Ubuntu

Disk guide

Beginner's guide to disks & disk partitions in Linux

Bash guide

Bash shell terminal
How to set the PATH variable in Bash
Hya, what do you think? Please comment.x