Steer clear of Android Market and its DRM

Google recently made headlines after they identified some malware being distributed through the Android Market. Not only did they stop distributing those apps, but they used their “remote kill switch” to remove the apps from phones where they were already downloaded. This is a kind of Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) that all computer users should avoid.

In this case, the DRM is being used to prevent developers from breaking phones’ security and collecting personal information without authorization. Those are laudable ends, but they don’t justify the means: anyone using the Android Market gives Google the power to remove software from their phones, and Google expressly reserves the right to do so whenever an app violates the Market’s policies. The same functionality is present in Apple’s iPhone and the Amazon Kindle. It’s just as bad here.

This is just one problem that stems from the sad fact that the Android Market is proprietary software. While most of the core Android operating system is free software, many popular apps like Google Maps and Android Market that are included with most Android phones are proprietary. People who want to use an Android phone but avoid these handcuffs need to take extra care to avoid these apps. Fortunately, unlike the iPhone or Kindle, users can install apps like F-Droid, which make it easy to install and update more free software on those phones.

Some people have asked us whether the Market’s DRM makes it impossible to distribute GPLed software through the App Store. It’s an understandable question, since restrictions in other mobile app stores have clashed with the GPL’s terms before. These terms do hurt users’ freedom, but they don’t create a conflict with the GPL specifically. The relevant term in the Android Market Terms of Service is 2.4; it says:

From time to time, Google may discover a Product on the Market that violates the Android Market Developer Distribution Agreement or other legal agreements, laws, regulations or policies. You agree that in such an instance Google retains the right to remotely remove those applications from your Device at its sole discretion.

When we evaluate whether a particular term creates a “further restriction” that could potentially violate the GPL, we’re checking to see whether it restricts the user from exercising a right granted in the GPL. This usually happens one of two ways: either the activity is prohibited outright (e.g., a term says “You may not distribute the software”), or the term places conditions on that activity that don’t exist in the GPL (e.g., a term says “You must pay us a fee when you distribute the software”).

This specific term does neither of those things. The GPL does grant users the right to run and use the software, but this term does not legally, directly restrict that right. Once you have a copy of the software, you can run it wherever you’re able. You’ll even be able to run it on a phone where it was previously banned, if you remove the Android Market first. The term gives Google some control of your phone specifically, but it doesn’t limit your right to use the software generally.

To reiterate: that surrender of control still hurts users. It just does not constitute a “further restriction” under the GPL’s terms. We encourage everyone to avoid using the Android Market because of this. If you’re distributing GPLed software for Android, make sure users can get it outside the Market—either through your own web site, or through repositories like F-Droid.

This article was originally published on Free Software Foundation.

Related Posts

The most important work for freedom that this culture has seen in generations "The Free Software Foundation and Richard Stallman's work represents the most important work for freedom that this culture, the American culture, has ...
Extend the Enterprise into the Cloud with Single Sign-On to Cloud-Based services In this blog post we examine how Single Sign-On from the enterprise to Cloud-based services is enabled. Single Sign-On is a critical component for any...
Why security standards are Critical for the Cloud Everyone loves standards, right? When is the last time you heard a vendor proudly say that their product or service was closed and proprietary? Howe...
Some File-Sharers Leave Trails To Their Front Door Following the publication of a paper which investigates how using the same username across multiple web sites may expose Internet users to scammers, T...
How People Broadcast Their Locations Without Meaning To Smart phones include geotagging features that many people aren't aware of. People were up in arms this week about the privacy implications of news...
ST-Ericsson and Linaro, working towards the first release By ST-Ericcson: Open source has become an important driving force in the smartphone industry and a particularly key area of focus for ST-Ericsson. We...

We Recommend These Vendors

Launch an SSD VPS in Europe, USA, Asia & Australia on Vultr's KVM-based Cloud platform starting at $5:00/month (15 GB SSD, 768 MB of RAM).

Deploy an SSD Cloud server in 55 seconds on DigitalOcean. Built for developers and starting at $5:00/month (20 GB SSD, 512 MB of RAM).


2 Comments

  1. SixDegrees

    Nothing stifles creativity and advancement in the software industry quite as effectively as the FSF. If it weren’t for Dick Stallman, Linux would control a significant chunk of market share by now. Thanks to the GPL’s every increasing stranglehold on market freedom, though, we’re stuck with a widely ignored backwater in the OS world.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*