Partner links

PCBSDports

Other Graphical Administrative Tools: Most of the graphical administrative tools are accessible from KDE’s System Settings. If you have used a KDE-based distribution, they should all the familiar. One that you might not be familiar with is the User Manager, whose default interface (the Simple View) is shown below. It is a very basic user management application. It has an Advanced View, but even that does not offer any truly advanced features.

Features, like account and password locking and password expiration, are lacking. And while the installer enforces minimum password length, this user manager does not. It even allows 1-character passwords, which is just as bad as enabling automatic logins. Note: Minimum password length, password case sensitivity, and other such properties can be affected by making the appropriate modifications or additions to /etc/login.conf.
PCBSDuseradmin

Security: A fresh installation of PC-BSD 8.2 shows two open ports – 22 and 631. Aside from an active firewall protecting it and the whole system, the OpenSSH server, which listens on port 22, is protected from brute-force attacks by DenyHosts. PC-BSD is the only desktop distribution that I have reviewed where the developer(s) have taken a proactive approach to protecting the OpenSSH server.

A screenshot of the main interface of the Firewall Manager.
PCBSDfirewall

The firewall has several preset rules.
PCBSDfirewall1

Adding new rules is pretty easy. However, like most graphical firewall applications on Linux and BSD desktop distributions, the range of rule options available via the graphical firewall manager does not even come close to what is configurable from the command-line, or for PC-BSD, which uses OpenBSD’s excellent Packet Filter (pf), from the configuration file (/etc/pf.conf).
PCBSDfirewall2

Here are a few rules which cannot be configured from the Firewall Manager:

pass in on em0 from any os "Linux 2.6" keep state
block in on em0 from any os "Windows 7"
block in on em0 from any os unknown

PF is really fun to play with. You should give it a try.

Final Thoughts: If you have never used PC-BSD, but have been thinking about installing it on a spare computer, now is the time to do it. If you do not have a spare, install it in a virtual environment. Use PC-BSD 8.2 to become familiar with how the system works, so that by the time PC-BSD 9 is released, you should know enough about it to want to make it your main desktop distribution. PC-BSD 9 will be the next stable release, and from what I’ve seen so far, it will be right up there with the rest of them.

Resources: You may download installation images for 32-bit and 64-bit platforms from here. If you have the time and a sense of adventure, grab snapshot releases of PC-BSD 9. Install it, test it and help the developers by reporting bugs. See this blog post for more instructions.

Want to dual-boot PC-BSD 8.2 and Windows 7? See how to dual-boot PC-BSD 8.2 and Windows 7.

Screenshots: Enjoy a few more screenshots from a test installation of PC-BSD 8.2.

KDE Netbook Plasma Desktop showing installed multimedia applications.
PCBSDnetbook

KDE Netbook Plasma Desktop showing installed Internet applications.
PCBSDnetbook1

KDE Netbook Plasma Desktop showing installed graphics applications.
PCBSDnetbook2

Dolphin, the KDE4 file manager, in split view.
PCBSDnetbook3

You can have quality articles like this delivered automatically to your feed reader or inbox by subscribing via RSS or email.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

Partner links

Newsletter: Subscribe for updates

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Grazyna Krupinski
11 years ago

Looking forward to giving ZFS a trial. 🙂

barricas
12 years ago

Thanks Sir, it’s better now. I used it on one of my newest projects and i love it. Thanks.

omelette
omelette
12 years ago

Good review, very informative. i think I may give this distro a try!

Steve
Steve
12 years ago

I have long been impressed with the BSD’s, and am happy that a new release has happened.

I am curious what others think of the performance of pc-bsd 8.2? I recall a previous release seemed slow, compared to other KDE’s on linux.

Thanks

Steve
Steve
Reply to  finid
12 years ago

finid,

My recent experience with KDE is with Aptosid, based on Debian’s unstable branch.

Oddly, performance with the above was very noticeably better than with a recent PC-BSD release, on the same hardware.

However, I will give pc-bsd another try.

Regards
steve.

Carl Mueller
Carl Mueller
12 years ago

Arch Linux also disables ssh by default.

Ian Pulsford
Ian Pulsford
13 years ago

That’s not a command prompt you were dropped to, that’s the bootloader’s prompt. Also, I haven’t tried the ports management tools you mentioned, but it is worth noting that they probably have not been updated because they haven’t needed to be. The base properties of FreeBSD change a lot less often than they tend to in Linux distributions.

Eddie
Eddie
13 years ago

I’ve been wanting to try PC-BSD 8.2. I downloaded the RC a couple of weeks ago and could not get it to finish the install. I believe I’ll download the final and give that a try. Thanks for the review.

Eddie

Get the latest

On social media

Security distros

Hacker
Linux distros for hacking and pentesting

Crypto mining OS

Bitcoin
Distros for mining bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies

Crypto hardware

MSI GeForce GTX 1070
Installing Nvidia GTX 1070 GPU drivers on Ubuntu

Disk guide

LVM
Beginner's guide to disks & disk partitions in Linux

Bash guide

Bash shell terminal
How to set the PATH variable in Bash
Categories
Archives
10
0
Hya, what do you think? Please comment.x
()
x