Supreme Court to Decide Standard for Proving Invalidity of a Patent

Today the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear Microsoft’s appeal in a case that could make it easier to invalidate a patent. If successful, Microsoft’s challenge should help in the fight against bad patents by leveling the playing field for showing that a patent is invalid. A Microsoft win in the case would benefit not only Microsoft, but also the free and open source software community. That’s why EFF, joined by Public Knowledge, the Computer & Communications Industry Association and the Apache Software Foundation, filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court supporting Microsoft.

As we previously reported, here’s some background: In court, parties have to prove their case by some “standard of proof.” In almost all civil cases, the standard is “preponderance of the evidence” – meaning it is more likely than not that the facts are true. When the question is invalidating a patent, however, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided that a defendant trying to prove a patent invalid must do so by a higher standard than normal civil cases, that of “clear and convincing” evidence. “Clear and convincing” means that the facts are “highly probable,” which is a much more difficult standard to meet than just a preponderance.

In a case three years ago, the Supreme Court had suggested that this high standard of proof should not apply where the prior art involved was not considered by the Patent Office before it issued the patent. Even still, the Federal Circuit has left the clear and convincing evidence standard untouched.

In today’s case, i4i Ltd. had sued Microsoft for patent infringement. i4i claimed its patent covered editing documents that contain markup languages like XML (Microsoft Word had XML editing capabilities). Microsoft had argued that i4i’s patent was invalid because the disclosed invention had been embodied in a software product sold in the United States more than a year before the patent application was filed – prior art that the patent examiner did not consider. The Federal Circuit applied its clear and convincing standard and rejected Microsoft’s invalidity argument. Microsoft petitioned the Supreme Court for certiorari, and was supported by eleven amicus briefs, including EFF’s. That Court has now granted Microsoft’s request to decide whether the Federal Circuit’s standard of proof rule is correct.

EFF argued in its brief that the Federal Circuit’s requirement that an accused infringer prove patent invalidity by “clear and convincing” evidence unfairly burdens patent defendants, especially in the free and open source software context. The standard undermines the traditional patent bargain between private patent owners and the public and threatens to impede innovation and the dissemination of knowledge. EFF is of course concerned with the effect illegitimate patents have on innovation.

We are pleased that the Supreme Court has agreed to hear Microsoft’s petition, and hope that this case will help to level the patent playing field. Now that the case will be fully briefed, EFF and its other amici will likely file another brief supporting Microsoft. A decision is expected by June 2011.

This article was written by Michael Barclay of the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Related Posts

The most important work for freedom that this culture has seen in generations "The Free Software Foundation and Richard Stallman's work represents the most important work for freedom that this culture, the American culture, has ...
ISP Cannot Be Forced To Block Copyright Infringing Files An advisor to the European Court of Justice has said that an ISP involved in a long-running file-sharing dispute cannot be forced to block or filter c...
Android Open Accessories Android’s USB port has in the past been curiously inaccessible to programmers. Last week at Google I/O we announced the Android Open Accessory APIs fo...
Common Sense and Security: Body Scanners, Accountability, and $2.4 Billion Worth of Securi... The Transportation Security Administration is feeling public heat these days over its combination of whole-body-image scanners and heavy-handed pat-do...
He can steal your smart phone’s and tablet’s encryption keys If you think that the encryption keys that your smart phone or tablet computer uses to protect data you want to keep others from accessing is secure, ...
Android App Permissions Dissected Based on our recent research and feedback from our users, we know that Android permissions can sometimes be confusing. Often it is hard to tell what d...

We Recommend These Vendors

Launch an SSD VPS in Europe, USA, Asia & Australia on Vultr's KVM-based Cloud platform starting at $5:00/month (15 GB SSD, 768 MB of RAM).

Deploy an SSD Cloud server in 55 seconds on DigitalOcean. Built for developers and starting at $5:00/month (20 GB SSD, 512 MB of RAM).


One Comment

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention linux Supreme Court to Decide Standard for Proving Invalidity of a Patent: Today the U.S. Supreme Court agreed ... -- Topsy.com

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*