PCLinuxOS 2010 review

  • Boot Loader Security – One physical security feature I like to use and always recommend to other users is the boot loader security feature. This gives you the option to password-protect the boot loader. Boot loader password protection is one of five methods you may use to boost the physical security rating of your computer. I like the fact that the installer gives you this option.
    GRUB configuration
  • Available Software – The repository has all the applications – free or non-free – that virtually all desktop users will ever need to use. Skype, Realplayer, libdvdcss2, Moovida, XBMC, Dropbox, etc, are either installed or available in the repository. You won’t have to go digging for third party repositories to add to the system.

Final Thoughts – One of the most important aspects of any distribution is the installer. In my opinion, a good installer is one that makes all the features built into the Linux kernel (and its supporting applications) available in an easy to configure manner. It can set a distribution apart from the field. It’s one of the better features of Fedora and Debian, and it is one of the weakest aspects of PCLinuxOS. Its installer is dated. It has not even kept up with that of Mandriva, the distribution it was derived from. I think the developers should consider switching to Anaconda, Fedora’s installer. Anaconda is also used by Sabayon.

The default configuration of PCLinuxOS is just sloppy. There is no (good) excuse for it. The community can do better than this, especially for a version designed for new users. Features that should be enabled out of the box, should. Users, especially new users, deserve a better user experience.

Resources – As noted earlier, there is an iso image for virtually all existing desktop environments available for download here. The KDE version used in this review may be downloaded from here.

Related Posts

Pardus Corporate 2 beta review Pardus Corporate 2 is the corporate (professional) edition of Pardus, the Linux distribution developed and maintained by the National Research Institu...
How to install PCLinuxOS 2011.6 on an encrypted LVM file system The 2011 editions of PCLinuxOS have started rolling off the shelves, with the KDE and LXDE editions being the first set out. (See PCLinuxOS 2011.6 KDE...
SalineOS 1.6 review SalineOS is a desktop Linux distribution based on Debian and uses the Xfce desktop environment. The first version reviewed on this website was SalineO...
Linux Mint Debian 201204 MATE/Cinnamon review Linux Mint Debian 201204 MATE/Cinnamon is the latest edition of Linux Mint Debian, a desktop distribution based on Debian. It offers a choice of two G...
PC-BSD 9 installer preview The current stable release of PC-BSD available for download is version 8.1. Version 8.2 is due sometime very early next year (mid to late January is t...
ROSA 2012 LXDE review ROSA 2012 LXDE is the stable release of a desktop edition of ROSA Linux which uses the Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment. ROSA Linux is published by...

We Recommend These Vendors

Launch an SSD VPS in Europe, USA, Asia & Australia on Vultr's KVM-based Cloud platform starting at $5:00/month (15 GB SSD, 768 MB of RAM).

Deploy an SSD Cloud server in 55 seconds on DigitalOcean. Built for developers and starting at $5:00/month (20 GB SSD, 512 MB of RAM).


  1. have used many distro..pclos sucks big time.

    Pity the software in Pardus Distro is so out of date

    Manjaro is the new standard

  2. I agree. I prefeer Linux Mint or Pardus 2011. Very nice forums there.

  3. James Swanson

    I installed PCLOS yesterday. After coming in contact with this PCLinuxOS review page and seeing what kind of people populate the community….I want no part of it. It’s off to Linux Mint Debian for me where the natives are friendly and don’t think they know everything. Why would I ever want to ask for help from a community that that displays the attitude I see displayed here.

  4. What a spectacularly useless review. The only thing which I am now wiser about is the inability of the writer to write a competent review. I was however somewhat more interested in learning a bit about the OS. Oh well……

  5. It is interesting to observe how different individuals or groups react to criticism. Take the reaction of the PCLinuxOS community to this critical review as an example of one type of reaction. Another type of reaction is that of a Sabayon Linux developer to my review of Sabayon 5.3.

    Like night and day.

    If you want to read the response of the other Sabayon devs to the post, just keep clicking on Next message. Very instructive.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *