<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hymera Open review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://linuxbsdos.com/2009/09/28/hymera-open-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://linuxbsdos.com/2009/09/28/hymera-open-review/</link>
	<description>Promoting Free Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: HAL</title>
		<link>http://linuxbsdos.com/2009/09/28/hymera-open-review/comment-page-1/#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator>HAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 21:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=2439#comment-624</guid>
		<description>Hymeria can be an interesting distro but I HATE the design... I hate 3-D dektops, Compiz, KDE4, plasma,the future Gnome3... I like the default Gnome2 two-panels design. So really, I can&#039;t like this eye-candy crap! I&#039;m sorry.

About LVM and disk encryption, they can be useful for some but not for a &#039;normal&#039; user. Idem for SELinux. Btw, they are rather/often a source of problem for a normal user. But if you&#039;re &quot;the paranoid of the district&quot;... as you want. ;-)

If my PC is stolen? Well, and what? I&#039;m not someone who administer one or more Linux servers for the NSA, the Army, the Department of Defense or something like that, neither a server database for a Swiss bank... lol Of course I just must have saved my documents but I have nothing to hide on my PC.

The Surveillance Self-Defense site is interesting but ultra-paranoid! But I&#039;m French and live in France...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hymeria can be an interesting distro but I HATE the design&#8230; I hate 3-D dektops, Compiz, KDE4, plasma,the future Gnome3&#8230; I like the default Gnome2 two-panels design. So really, I can&#8217;t like this eye-candy crap! I&#8217;m sorry.</p>
<p>About LVM and disk encryption, they can be useful for some but not for a &#8216;normal&#8217; user. Idem for SELinux. Btw, they are rather/often a source of problem for a normal user. But if you&#8217;re &#8220;the paranoid of the district&#8221;&#8230; as you want. <img src='http://linuxbsdos.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>If my PC is stolen? Well, and what? I&#8217;m not someone who administer one or more Linux servers for the NSA, the Army, the Department of Defense or something like that, neither a server database for a Swiss bank&#8230; lol Of course I just must have saved my documents but I have nothing to hide on my PC.</p>
<p>The Surveillance Self-Defense site is interesting but ultra-paranoid! But I&#8217;m French and live in France&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: finid</title>
		<link>http://linuxbsdos.com/2009/09/28/hymera-open-review/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>finid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=2439#comment-310</guid>
		<description>Yep, and this review was based on the English version. The issues I drew attention, the localization issues, are supposed to have been fixed in a later release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, and this review was based on the English version. The issues I drew attention, the localization issues, are supposed to have been fixed in a later release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mi6</title>
		<link>http://linuxbsdos.com/2009/09/28/hymera-open-review/comment-page-1/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>mi6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=2439#comment-309</guid>
		<description>AFAIK, there is a Hymera English version:
http://mirror.hymera.it/Hymera-Open-20090910_En.iso</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AFAIK, there is a Hymera English version:<br />
<a href="http://mirror.hymera.it/Hymera-Open-20090910_En.iso" rel="nofollow">http://mirror.hymera.it/Hymera-Open-20090910_En.iso</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 04/10/2009: New X Server, Nexuiz, Arora, OpenSSH, Perl &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://linuxbsdos.com/2009/09/28/hymera-open-review/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 04/10/2009: New X Server, Nexuiz, Arora, OpenSSH, Perl &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 23:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=2439#comment-308</guid>
		<description>[...] Hymera Open review Hymera is a Debian-based, GNU/Linux operating system. It is a relatively brand new distribution developed and maintained by Hymera Engineering S.r.l., an Information Technology outfit based in Milan, Italy. Hymera Engineering publishes four versions of their Linux distribution – Hymera Open, Hymera Desktop, Hymera Evolution, and Hymera Server. This review is of Hymera Open, the free, desktop-oriented version. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hymera Open review Hymera is a Debian-based, GNU/Linux operating system. It is a relatively brand new distribution developed and maintained by Hymera Engineering S.r.l., an Information Technology outfit based in Milan, Italy. Hymera Engineering publishes four versions of their Linux distribution – Hymera Open, Hymera Desktop, Hymera Evolution, and Hymera Server. This review is of Hymera Open, the free, desktop-oriented version. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bulldog</title>
		<link>http://linuxbsdos.com/2009/09/28/hymera-open-review/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Bulldog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 03:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=2439#comment-307</guid>
		<description>Hymera has its possibilities to be a great destro but until it&#039;s a full English destro I will stay with Arch and Sidux. One thing that is a must have is, stability. I don&#039;t see it in Hymera at this time. Keep working on the great designs,appearance and an all English destro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hymera has its possibilities to be a great destro but until it&#8217;s a full English destro I will stay with Arch and Sidux. One thing that is a must have is, stability. I don&#8217;t see it in Hymera at this time. Keep working on the great designs,appearance and an all English destro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -dejv</title>
		<link>http://linuxbsdos.com/2009/09/28/hymera-open-review/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>-dejv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=2439#comment-306</guid>
		<description>do you have an asus k8v-x se?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do you have an asus k8v-x se?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacLone</title>
		<link>http://linuxbsdos.com/2009/09/28/hymera-open-review/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>MacLone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=2439#comment-302</guid>
		<description>My PC boots 32 and 64 bit distros.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My PC boots 32 and 64 bit distros.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: finid</title>
		<link>http://linuxbsdos.com/2009/09/28/hymera-open-review/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>finid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=2439#comment-301</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not in a position to speak for Hymera, but you can be sure that a 64-bit version is in the works. &lt;a href=&quot;http://linuxbsdos.com/2009/08/03/pardus-2009-review/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pardus&lt;/a&gt; is in the same position. With regards to the language  (localization) problem, a moderator in their forum said that that has been fixed in a newer release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not in a position to speak for Hymera, but you can be sure that a 64-bit version is in the works. <a href="http://linuxbsdos.com/2009/08/03/pardus-2009-review/" rel="nofollow">Pardus</a> is in the same position. With regards to the language  (localization) problem, a moderator in their forum said that that has been fixed in a newer release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie Wilson</title>
		<link>http://linuxbsdos.com/2009/09/28/hymera-open-review/comment-page-1/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=2439#comment-300</guid>
		<description>Without 64 bit support the distro is a no go. I can understand a one man project not having both a 32 bit and a 64 bit version but not a company like this. There is no excuse for them not to have one. They also need to get their language problem straightened out. Other than that it seems like a well put together distro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without 64 bit support the distro is a no go. I can understand a one man project not having both a 32 bit and a 64 bit version but not a company like this. There is no excuse for them not to have one. They also need to get their language problem straightened out. Other than that it seems like a well put together distro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: finid</title>
		<link>http://linuxbsdos.com/2009/09/28/hymera-open-review/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>finid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=2439#comment-299</guid>
		<description>You can get away with LVM, but disk encryption is a must-have. It&#039;s a very important component of a computer&#039;s security posture. The major distros, that is, the &quot;original&quot; distros (Debian, Fedora, and Mandriva) all have installers with support for disk encryption. You should spend some time at &lt;a href=&quot;https://ssd.eff.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Surveillance Self-Defense&lt;/a&gt;. 

Meanwhile, ponder this: If your PC is ever stolen, what&#039;s going to be standing between your data and the PC&#039;s new &quot;owners?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can get away with LVM, but disk encryption is a must-have. It&#8217;s a very important component of a computer&#8217;s security posture. The major distros, that is, the &#8220;original&#8221; distros (Debian, Fedora, and Mandriva) all have installers with support for disk encryption. You should spend some time at <a href="https://ssd.eff.org/" rel="nofollow">Surveillance Self-Defense</a>. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, ponder this: If your PC is ever stolen, what&#8217;s going to be standing between your data and the PC&#8217;s new &#8220;owners?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: finid</title>
		<link>http://linuxbsdos.com/2009/09/28/hymera-open-review/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>finid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=2439#comment-298</guid>
		<description>I think the &quot;problem&quot; is not with Hymera, but your hardware. Your PC is a 64-bit system, but Hymera is only supported on x68 platforms.  Check out the Supported Platforms section at &lt;a href=&quot;http://linuxbsdos.com/2009/09/28/hymera-open/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hymera Open&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the &#8220;problem&#8221; is not with Hymera, but your hardware. Your PC is a 64-bit system, but Hymera is only supported on x68 platforms.  Check out the Supported Platforms section at <a href="http://linuxbsdos.com/2009/09/28/hymera-open/" rel="nofollow">Hymera Open</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacLone</title>
		<link>http://linuxbsdos.com/2009/09/28/hymera-open-review/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>MacLone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=2439#comment-297</guid>
		<description>Dowloaded 3 times the first DVD iso a few months ago and never booted the installed system, no matter what i did to solve it. I have downloaded this new version they offer and had exactly the same stupid xorg problems because the extremely lousy harware detection Hymera has.
Every distro i use, even the worst of them boots on my machine but not Hymera.
(Athlon64 3000+, 1GB, FX5600)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dowloaded 3 times the first DVD iso a few months ago and never booted the installed system, no matter what i did to solve it. I have downloaded this new version they offer and had exactly the same stupid xorg problems because the extremely lousy harware detection Hymera has.<br />
Every distro i use, even the worst of them boots on my machine but not Hymera.<br />
(Athlon64 3000+, 1GB, FX5600)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yehdev_cc</title>
		<link>http://linuxbsdos.com/2009/09/28/hymera-open-review/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>yehdev_cc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxbsdos.com/?p=2439#comment-296</guid>
		<description>I’d proclaim it a perfect desktop Linux distribution if the installer provided support for setting up LVM and disk encryption, and it came with a graphical firewall client installed and configured.

Good review, however, I don&#039;t agree with the previous sentences. IMO, LVM and partition encryption is not a key feature to a desktop distribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’d proclaim it a perfect desktop Linux distribution if the installer provided support for setting up LVM and disk encryption, and it came with a graphical firewall client installed and configured.</p>
<p>Good review, however, I don&#8217;t agree with the previous sentences. IMO, LVM and partition encryption is not a key feature to a desktop distribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.575 seconds -->
