Why free software shouldn’t depend on Mono or C#

by Richard M. Stallman

Debian’s decision to include Mono in its principal way of installing GNOME, for the sake of Tomboy which is an application written in C#, leads the community in a risky direction. It is dangerous to depend on C#, so we need to discourage its use.

The problem is not unique to Mono; any free implementation of C# would raise the same issue. The danger is that Microsoft is probably planning to force all free C# implementations underground some day using software patents. (See http://swpat.org and http://progfree.org.) This is a serious danger, and only fools would ignore it until the day it actually happens. We need to take precautions now to protect ourselves from this future danger.

This is not to say that implementing C# is a bad thing. Free C# implementations permit users to run their C# programs on free platforms, which is good. (The GNU Project has an implementation of C# also, called Portable.NET.) Ideally we want to provide free implementations for all languages that programmers have used.

The problem is not in the C# implementations, but rather in Tomboy and other applications written in C#. If we lose the use of C#, we will lose them too. That doesn’t make them unethical, but it means that writing them and using them is taking a gratuitous risk.

We should systematically arrange to depend on the free C# implementations as little as possible. In other words, we should discourage people from writing programs in C#. Therefore, we should not include C# implementations in the default installation of GNU/Linux distributions or in their principal ways of installing GNOME, and we should distribute and recommend non-C# applications rather than comparable C# applications whenever possible.

An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that Mono would now be installed by default in Debian. We have corrected this text, and we are sorry for the error.

This article was originally published on the Free Software Foundation’s website.

Related Posts

Breaking the dependency on proprietary software: A call to nonprofits to refuse Microsoft ... "sinking money and time into proprietary software is inconsistent with the core values of freedom and progress." The Free Software Foundation (FSF)...
Open letter to Google: free VP8, and use it on YouTube With its purchase of the On2 video compression technology company having been completed on Wednesday February 16, 2010, Google now has the opportunity...
Video, Freedom And Mozilla My LCA talk on Friday was about why open video is critically important to free software, and what Mozilla is doing about (plus a discussion of the rel...
The Toyota recall and the case for open, auditable source code Public Safety is not a matter of Private Concern In a recent article, Slate's Farhad Manjoo attempts to play down fears of faulty software in car bra...
The Public Domain Manifesto The public domain, as we understand it, is the wealth of information that is free from the barriers to access or reuse usually associated with copyrig...
Governments May Fake SSL Certificates Today two computer security researchers, Christopher Soghoian and Sid Stamm, released a draft of a forthcoming research paper in which they present ev...

We Recommend These Vendors and Free Offers

Launch an SSD VPS in Europe, USA, Asia & Australia on Vultr's KVM-based Cloud platform starting at $5:00/month (15 GB SSD, 768 MB of RAM).

Deploy an SSD Cloud server in 55 seconds on DigitalOcean. Built for developers and starting at $5:00/month (20 GB SSD, 512 MB of RAM).

Want to become an expert ethical hacker and penetration tester? Request your free video training course of Online Penetration Testing and Ethical Hacking

Whether you're new to Linux or are a Linux guru, you can learn a lot more about the Linux kernel by requesting your free ebook of Linux Kernel In A Nutshell.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *